Aside

Recently I have been reading quite a few articles that are, quite frankly, just hating on Dan Brown and his writing. Mostly it’s because of the liberties he took with the life events of certain religious/ historical figures and other facts. This leaves me perplexed. When I pick up a book knowing that it is a work of fiction, I expect to be intrigued. I certainly don’t expect all of it to be true. I really enjoyed all of his novels so far. It didn’t matter to  me that he was making stuff up when he wrote them. Isn’t that what a fiction writer does? I fail to understand why religious accuracy  has anything to do with it. Nowhere in his writing does he claim that he is stating facts. All he did was pose an alternative reality. If people insist on believing that everything he wrote about the Louvre, for example, is true and then are disappointed when they go there and find out otherwise, well then they will fall apart when they  travel to Forks and realize that the vampiric Cullens do not actually live there.

Dan Brown and Fiction

Advertisements

2 comments on “Dan Brown and Fiction

  1. I think those who can’t write bitch. I love reading all the effete comments on Shades of Grey and Dan Brown. Hello critics these guys broke the code. They give readers what readers want and too bad if the literary stuff is not up to the poorer writers standards. Nice post. Thanks

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s